NLDS recaps
Wow, I know a lot of people picked the Cubs to knock the Braves out of the playoffs, but how many people really thought both underdogs would win and we'd have a Chicago vs. Florida NLCS? Technically, I was wrong with both of my predictions in the NL, but fundamentally I feel good about one of them.
When I discussed the San Francisco vs. Florida series, I said the following to conclude the post:
"For my prediction, I'll go with the Giants in five games. I thought long and hard about picking the Marlins because I think this series is a lot closer than most people seem to think, but in the end I think Schmidt and Bonds will be able to make the difference for the Giants."
Well, the Giants dominated the Marlins in game one, and I believe they likely would have done so again in game five. However, in between, the Marlins won a shootout in California and two crazy games in Florida. Game two saw the Marlins take a quick 2-0 lead, only to have the Giants tie things up in the sixth. San Francisco then took a 3-2 lead in the top of the 11th, but the Marlins rallied for two runs with two outs to win the game in the bottom of the frame. In game three, Florida jumped out to a 5-1 lead before the Giants came back to tie the game in, you guessed it, the sixth inning. Florida then took a 7-5 lead in the bottom of the eighth thanks to a close play at home plate in which the ball got dislodged and rolled away. The Giants almost came back in the top of the ninth, but the Marlins won thanks to a close play at home plate in which the ball did not get dislodged.
When talking about the starting lineups of the two teams before the series, I said the following:
"The Giants obviously win left field by a lot, and they probably win right field by a little, but there's not another position where I'd say they definitely have the edge, or even another position where I could say they're definitely even with the Marlins."
Well, the Giants did have an advantage in left field, where Barry Bonds "hit" .222/.588/.333 (.921) for the Giants thanks mostly to eight walks while Jeff Conine hit just .267/.353/.267 (.620).
However, the Giants also had a significant advantage at third base, where Edgardo Alfonzo hit .529/.556/.764 (1.320) while protecting Bonds. Florida's third baseman, Miguel Cabrera (even though he didn't start all four games), hit .286/.375/.429 (.804) with all of his damage coming when he went 4-for-5 in game four.
Unfortunately for the Giants, their other seven offensive spots (including the pitchers) were pretty much black holes. The Marlins, on the other hand, had Ivan Rodriguez hitting .353/.450/.588 (1.038) and Luis Castillo hitting .294/.400/.471 (.871). They also got some surprising offense from their pitchers (.571/.571/.857), especially Dontrelle Willis and his 3-for-3 with a triple performance in game four.
Of course, Florida didn't actually hit much better than San Francisco did. The Marlins hit .253/.327/.363 (.690) while the Giants hit .235/.341/.301 (.642). The two teams had about the same number of at-bats with runners on base and with runners in scoring position, and the Giants hit slightly better in those two situations than the Marlins did.
No, probably the biggest reason the Marlins outscored the Giants 20-16 in the series is that San Francisco committed seven errors to Florida's two. The Giants scored one unearned run in the series while the Marlins scored five of them. There's your four-run difference right there.
Pitching-wise, I said that the Giants had the advantage in games one and five, and that turned out to be a no-brainer. Jason Schmidt was brilliant while pitching a complete game shutout in game one, allowing just three hits while striking out five. Florida's starter, Josh Beckett, had a very nice game one himself, allowing a run on two hits and five walks with nine strikeouts in seven innings, but the Giants had to feel good about the matchup of Schmidt vs. Beckett going into game five. Unfortunately for them, they weren't able to force a game five.
For game two, I thought the pitching matchup was about even, and it certainly turned out that way as Sidney Ponson and Brad Penny each allowed four runs and neither of them was able to go six innings. The difference in the game is that the Marlins got to the Giants bullpen better than the Giants got to the Marlins bullpen.
Talking about those bullpens before the series, I said the following:
"The Giants have a definite edge in the bullpen, although the Marlins do have two or three very dependable relievers, which is sometimes all you need in a playoff series."
Overall, the Marlins relievers had a 2.13 ERA in 12.2 innings while the Giants relievers had a 3.45 ERA in 15.2 innings. While I said that the Marlins have two or three relievers they can rely on, they ended up getting great performances from four of their bullpen guys. For the Giants, however, only Matt Herges was really lights out from the bullpen. In fact, San Francisco's relievers only allowed six earned runs, but they also allowed five unearned runs as the Giants defense made their jobs harder.
I thought the Marlins had starting pitcher advantage in game three, but it turned out to be just a one-inning advantage. Mark Redman and Kirk Rueter each allowed two runs, but Redman lasted six innings and Rueter could only go five. However, the bullpens for both teams were brilliant in this game until the fateful 11th inning.
In game four, it was a matchup of rookies and San Francisco's (Jerome Williams) lasted just two innings and allowed three innings. Fortunately for the Giants, they were able to come back later against Florida's (Willis). However, the Marlins got the better of the rest of the game and that was that.
I can't take credit for getting the series right because I picked the Giants to win and they didn't win, but I am pleased that I wrote that I thought this series was a lot closer than most other people did. The Giants were basically just a two-man team going into the playoffs and those two played fine in this series. A couple other guys stepped up in the series, but a lot of guys stepped down for them, and they came up short in two close games. Had they been able to luck their way to a win in one of those games, they probably would have won the series. But most people didn't even think it would come down to luck and I'm happy to say that I did.
And now that I'm done taking as much credit as possible for that series, it's time to talk about the series I really screwed up on. Actually, I only really messed up on one thing in the series between the Braves and Cubs.
I had a feeling the Braves would have a tough time against Mark Prior and they definitely did as he pitched a complete game, allowing one run on two hits and four walks with seven strikeouts.
Where I messed up was thinking that the Braves would be able to get some runs on the board against Kerry Wood. Wood started two games, allowing three runs on seven hits and seven walks with 18 strikeouts in 15.1 innings for a 1.76 ERA. If MVP awards were given out in the division series, Wood would have gotten the award for this series. He was much better than I thought he would be.
I thought the Braves starting pitchers would be at least decent since the Cubs offense wasn't very good, but it didn't really work out that way. Greg Maddux did have a nice, albeit short, outing with two runs allowed in six innings, but Russ Ortiz and Mike Hampton weren't very good. In their four starts, they allowed 12 runs in 23.1 innings for a 4.63 ERA. Basically, they were good enough to beat Carlos Zambrano and Matt Clement, who combined to allow seven runs in 10.1 innings for a 6.10 ERA, but they weren't nearly good enough to beat Wood.
Offensively, each team only had one really good hitter. Moises Alou hit .500/.524/.550 (1.074) for the Cubs while Marcus Giles hit .357/.412/.571 (.983) for the Braves. Eric Karros provided some surprising pop and Aramis Ramirez did about the same thing he did during the regular season for the Cubs, while Gary Sheffield and Andruw Jones did almost nothing for the Braves.
In the end, however, defense once again probably played as big a role in the series as the difference between the two offenses did. Atlanta committed six errors while Chicago did not make any. The Cubs outscored the Braves 19-15 in the series and scored one unearned run while the Braves obviously didn't score any.
So, that's about how we ended up with Marlins against Cubs in the NLCS. None of the four teams really tore things up offensively, but the Cubs and Marlins pitched better and played better defense. If the second round in the NL is anything like the first round, it should be pretty darn exciting.